Load advancement procedure fails error code 103
Перейти к содержимому

Load advancement procedure fails error code 103

  • автор:

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

  • You’re a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
  • You’ve disabled cookies in your web browser.
  • A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article.

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Contact US

*Eng-Tips’s functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Load advancement fail Error 103

Load advancement fail Error 103

Load advancement fail Error 103

dccd (Civil/Environmental)
28 Feb 22 14:48

Hi , all. I have encountered this error Load advancement fail Error 103 countless. How to overcome this error in Plaxis ?

RE: Load advancement fail Error 103

EireChch (Geotechnical) 1 Mar 22 04:55

RE: Load advancement fail Error 103

dccd (Civil/Environmental)
1 Mar 22 22:49

Quote (EireChch)

It didnt work. Please help

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

News

Copyright © 2024 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy

Публикация участника Uzma Khan

Geotechnical Design Engineer |Retaining Wall Design Engineer|Building Design Engineer|Slope Stability Analysis. 8 мес.

Just published a new blog post where I dive into the solutions for resolving PLAXIS Error Code 103. �� If you’ve ever encountered this error during your simulations or are simply curious about load advancement procedure failures, this blog is a must-read! �� https://lnkd.in/dtkBhNjW Join me as I break down the causes of Error Code 103 and provide step-by-step guidance on how to overcome it. ��️ #PLAXIS #GeotechnicalEngineering #Simulation #ErrorSolutions #ProblemSolving #BlogPost #ProfessionalDevelopment

Solving PLAXIS Error Code 103: Understanding and Resolving Load Advancement Procedure Failures

legendofcivil.com
  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

How about turning off Arc length control?

Senior Geotechnical Engineer at Beca

In my experience for example a stage of changing the stiffness of structures due to corrosion would potentially lead to this error. For this situation, slightly changing a load in the model (e. g. surchage) would resolve.

Assistant Manager (Geotechnical) — RITES Limited

It can also be a case where the structure (or the foundation) is just failing under the load.

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

Больше актуальных публикаций

Independent Scientist — Consultant & Entrepreneur 6 мес. Отредактировано

Presenting the first outcomes of an adaptive finite element #simulation, depicting the process of convective dissolution of free #CO2 into an aquifer. This mechanism is pivotal in guaranteeing the enduring safety of #carbon storage within saline aquifers. Notably, the model represents a progressive extension of the HydroTec code, which has a history in the realm of #groundwater and #geothermal modeling.

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

retired mechanical engineer at School of Hard Knocks 10 мес.

This new research may prove beneficial to pipeline hydraulic engineers and designers of flow modeling software under certain flow regimes. https://lnkd.in/gNRB_B2Q

Hydrodynamics of finite-length pipes at intermediate Reynolds numbers | Journal of Fluid Mechanics | Cambridge Core

cambridge.org
  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

153 отслеживающих 9 мес.

The Frame Deflections and Reactions (STS18) is an experiment for the study of rectangular portals subjected to vertical loads. Mounts on the Structures platform and connects to the Structures automatic data acquisition unit and software (VDAS® Onboard). Find out more about this product from TecQuipment’s Next Generation Structures range of teaching equipment here: https://lnkd.in/eyZqVpB3 #structrues #structuralengineering #deflections #engineering #engineeringeducation

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

Ph.D., E.I.T 1 г

Glad to share another paper concerning the #publicsafety and #structuralengineering . The paper entitled Spatial wind speed interpolation using Isoparametric shape functions for structural loading. This study developed a spatial interpolation technique using Isoparametric finite element shape functions to derive wind speed records for all unsampled Kansas counties from actual data recorded at 17 city locations within and around Kansas. A computational method using the Kaimal spectrum is presented for generating artificial time histories of wind speeds. This is done to extract wind-cycle distribution using the Rainflow counting technique, which can be used as input for fatigue analysis procedures of highway sign structures. Comprehensive validation, verification and benchmarking has been performed in this paper at all spatial and time span levels to guarantee the accuracy and efficiency of the algorithm developed. The comparison of the validation measures strongly suggests a very accurate interpolation scheme that can be confidently used in further fatigue computations and analysis. A user-friendly software was designed using C# to extract wind-speed cycles for all Kansas counties related to different time spans. This software is expected to facilitate fatigue-life prediction because it generates a full range of wind-loading. I would like to thank my co-authors Prof. Hayder Rasheed, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.ACI, F.SEI and Mr. Abdulkareem Alkhiary https://lnkd.in/dFU7-AK5

Spatial wind speed interpolation using Isoparametric shape functions for structural loading

sciencedirect.com
  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

725 отслеживающих 4 мес. Отредактировано

An artistic portrayal of streamlines appeared on the November 1989 cover of JPT linked with SPE-18327-PA (https://lnkd.in/dM9WzH39) titled «Fractal Methods Improve Mitsue Miscible Predictions.» The authors innovatively merged 2D streamtubes with 2D cross-sections to simulate a WAG displacement and model field performance. Given the limited computational resources available 34 years ago, combining aerial and vertical 2D displacement efficiencies was a promising approach to quantify the 3D field recovery efficiency. A significant change from 1989, streamlines today are fully 3D and able to accommodate fine scale-geological descriptions and 3-phase flow physics that accounts for fluid compressibility, gravity, and capillary pressure. However, the idea of deconvoluting the 3D problem still holds. The 3D streamlines are updated to capture the non-linearities in the flow field due to well changes, such as rate adjustments, opening, closing, changing completions, and new wells coming online and 1D numerical solutions along individual streamlines solve the relevant transport problem. Streamlines also provide key dynamic well pattern metrics that empower engineers to quickly enhance flood performance given available surface resources. #reservoirengineering #eor #reservoircharacterization #reservoirsimulation #reservoirengineer

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

1 890 отслеживающих 9 мес.

The Frame Deflections and Reactions (STS18) is an experiment for the study of rectangular portals subjected to vertical loads. Mounts on the Structures platform and connects to the Structures automatic data acquisition unit and software (VDAS® Onboard). Find out more about this product from TecQuipment’s Next Generation Structures range of teaching equipment here: https://lnkd.in/eyZqVpB3 #structrues #structuralengineering #deflections #engineering #engineeringeducation

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

CAE ENGINEER 1 мес.

#ImplcitvsExplicit #Part2 6. Implicit analysis might be chosen for a structural analysis project when the loading conditions change gradually, and inertia effects are negligible. For example, if you want to analyze the long-term behavior of a tall building under wind loads, where the wind forces change slowly over time, and the mass of the building is much larger than the applied loads, implicit analysis would be appropriate. 7. The key characteristic of explicit analysis is that it is suitable for dynamic and rapidly changing events. It is capable of capturing the transient response of a structure accurately. Examples of such events include impact loading, blast analysis, and crash simulations. 8. The main difference between implicit and explicit analysis lies in their time integration approach. In implicit analysis, the assumption of quasi-static equilibrium allows for solving the equilibrium equations at each time step. This approach is computationally efficient since it requires fewer time steps. On the other hand, explicit analysis models the dynamic response over time by integrating the equations of motion numerically. This explicit time integration accounts for the dynamic behavior of the structure and allows for capturing rapid changes accurately. 9. A real-world application for implicit analysis would be the structural stability analysis of a building under constant loads. For example, studying the long-term behavior of a high-rise building under gravity loads or analyzing the deformation of a dam under the constant pressure of water would require implicit analysis. 10. The impact on computational requirements and solution accuracy is that implicit analysis generally requires fewer time steps, making it computationally efficient for certain scenarios. Since it assumes quasi-static equilibrium, it sacrifices some accuracy in capturing dynamic behavior. On the other hand, explicit analysis provides a more accurate representation of dynamic events but at the expense of increased computational cost due to the need for smaller time steps. It is important to choose the appropriate analysis method based on the specific requirements of the problem at hand.

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

16 318 отслеживающих 1 мес.

FLOW-3D (X) can combine automation with optimization to quickly meet the design objectives. The simulation represents a simple overflow weir with the activation of the sediment transport model to simulate sediment transportation. The optimization goal here is to decide upon weir opening dimensions that result in maximum volume flow rate and minimum scouring of sediment bed. A budget of 30 iterations is specified. FLOW-3D (x) runs 30 simulations to generate a response surface that represents the behavior of the system. This allows the best solution to be found. FLOW-3D (X) Workflow and results can be seen in the video. Learn more about FLOW-3D HYDRO and FLOW-3D (X) at https://lnkd.in/dSCFcZgn #cfd #computationalfluiddynamics #flow3d #flow3dhydro #simulation #simulationsoftware #simulations #engineering #technology #fluiddynamics #fluidflow #turbulence #sediment #scouring #optimization #automation #water #design

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

Senior Geomodeller Specialist and Reservoir Engineer/ Petrel expert and support/RMS/SKUA/Instructor_Consulting and Solution in 3D Static Reservoir Modeling. Geostatistics.Business development.Diplomado in Geomodelling. 5 мес.

Property modeling Scale-up well logs The Scale up well logs process averages the values to the cells in the 3D grid that are penetrated by the wells and gives the cell one single value per upscaled log. These cells are later used as a starting point for Property modeling.

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

Senior CFD Application Engineer. Lecturer Assistant & PhD Researcher at Aerospace Department, Cairo University 2 мес. Отредактировано

Optimization simulation by CFD software FLOW-3D HYDRO & and automation software FLOW-3D (x) for water moving with small particles across screen channels. #flow3d #elrefay #water #hydro #hydrodynamics #particles #screen #moving

2 179 отслеживающих

Hello, ��, Attention to All Hydrodynamics & Water Experts We want to share our last simulation by CFD software FLOW-3D HYDRO and the optimization software FLOW-3D (x) for water moving across screen channels. We made 2 lines of screens: the first line is for preventing small particles from moving through the channels, and the second line is to ensure no smaller particles will move. The porosity for all screens in the first line is 0.75 and for the second line, it is 0.25 There are multiple particles moving, whose diameter differs from (0.2 to 1) the objective of the optimization is to change the porosity for all screens in the first line to minimize the number of particles after the first line of screens. What can we do for this simulation to prevent the existing particles after the second line of screens? #flow3d #elrefay #water #hydro #hydrodynamics #particles #screen #moving

  • Копировать
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Чтобы просмотреть или add a comment, выполните вход

6 023 отслеживающих

  • LinkedIn © 2024 г.
  • О компании
  • Специальные возможности
  • Пользовательское соглашение
  • Политика конфиденциальности
  • Политика использования файлов cookie
  • Политика защиты авторских прав
  • Политика торговой марки
  • Настройки гостя
  • Правила сообщества
  • العربية (арабский)
  • Čeština (чешский)
  • Dansk (датский)
  • Deutsch (немецкий)
  • English (английский)
  • Español (испанский)
  • Français (французский)
  • हिंदी (хинди)
  • Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
  • Italiano (итальянский)
  • 日本語 (японский)
  • 한국어 (корейский)
  • Bahasa Malaysia (малайский)
  • Nederlands (нидерландский)
  • Norsk (норвежский)
  • Polski (польский)
  • Português (португальский)
  • Română (румынский)
  • Русский (Russian)
  • Svenska (шведский)
  • ภาษาไทย (тайский)
  • Tagalog (тагальский)
  • Türkçe (турецкий)
  • Українська (украинский)
  • 简体中文 (китайский (упрощенный))
  • 正體中文 (китайский (традиционный))

Выполните вход, чтобы просмотреть больше контента

Чтобы продолжить поиск, создайте бесплатную уч. запись или выполните вход

Коды ошибок в PLAXIS и
варианты их решения

Если в результате расчёта вместо успешно рассчитанной фазы Вы получили ошибку, в первую очередь необходимо узнать код ошибки. Для этого дважды щёлкните левой кнопкой мыши по фазе с красным крестиком и в правой части появившегося окна Phases найдите информацию в поле Log info for last calculation. В этом окне будет указан код ошибки и её краткое описание.

Ниже представлена таблица, которая поможет Вам разобраться с той или иной проблемой. Таблица состоит из трёх столбцов:

  1. Код ошибки. Номер ошибки.
  2. Сообщение. Описание ошибки.
  3. Подсказка. Возможные причины возникновения ошибки и варианты её решения.
Код ошибки
Сообщение
Подсказка
  • Плохое качество сетки конечных элементов (элементы с низким качеством). Качество сетки можно посмотреть в сгенерированной сетке (меню Mesh (Сетка) – пункт Quality (Качество)).
  • Плохое качество сетки конечных элементов (элементы с низким качеством). Качество сетки можно посмотреть в сгенерированной сетке (меню Mesh (Сетка) – пункт Quality (Качество)).
  • Потерянные граничные условия. Проверьте граничные условия на данной фазе.
  • Плавающие (несоединенные) кластеры / объемы.
  • Конечные элементы плохой формы: хорошие конечные элементы близки по форме к равностороннему треугольнику. Пожалуйста, проверьте качество сетки конечных элементов.
  • Большая разница жёсткостей. Из-за численных причин значения жёсткости в модели не могут сильно отличаться друг от друга (например, отношение между наименьшей и наибольшей жёсткостями больше 10 6 ).
  • Плохое качество сетки конечных элементов. Проверьте качество сетки в Output (Вывод данных) и при необходимости измените её.
  • Потерянные граничные условия. Проверьте граничные условия на данной фазе.
  • Плавающие / несоединенные кластеры / объёмы.
  • Нулевая длина ряда погруженных балок в 2D. Обновитесь до версии 2D 2012.01 и создайте сетку конечных элементов заново.
  • Ошибка с границами свободного поля. Пожалуйста, проверьте исходные данные.

ООО «НИП-Информатика»
Официальный партнёр
Bentley Systems в России,
направление PLAXIS

192102, Россия,
г. Санкт-Петербург,
ул. Фучика, д. 4, лит. «К».

  • Программы
  • PLAXIS 2D
  • PLAXIS 3D
  • Области применения
  • Гражданское строительство
  • Добыча полезных ископаемых
  • Горное дело и тоннелестроение
  • О компании
  • НИП-Информатика
  • О PLAXIS
  • Новости и обновления
  • Полезные ресурсы
  • База знаний PLAXIS
  • Телеграм-канал
  • YouTube-канал

Мы используем файлы cookie

Продолжая использовать данный веб-сайт, вы соглашаетесь с тем, что Plaxis.ru может использовать файлы «cookie» в целях хранения ваших учетных данных, параметров и предпочтений, оптимизации работы веб-сайта.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *